📘 CodingMarble Learn

The Stolypin Reforms (1906–1911): Peasants as Owners, Resettlement and the III and IV Dumas

Pyotr Stolypin, prime minister from 1906, answered the unrest of 1905 with force and with reform. His land reform of 9 November 1906 let peasants leave the village commune and own compact farms; the state also helped about 3 million people settle in the east. After the 3 June 1907 change in the voting law, the III Duma (1907–12) and IV Duma (1912–17) leaned to landowners. About a quarter of peasant households left the commune before Stolypin was shot in 1911 and the war stopped the work.

🎬 Step-by-step story

  1. Why reform? Peasants rose in 1905–06. Stolypin became prime minister in 1906 with a big idea: make peasants owners.
  2. Commune or own farm? A law of 1906 let peasants leave the commune and take one compact plot as their own.
  3. Moving east. The state helped families settle in the thin-populated east. About 3 million went in 1906–14.
  4. The Dumas. The first two were dissolved. The 1907 voting law favoured landowners, so III and IV Dumas leaned right.
  5. Results. About 1 in 4 households left the commune and harvests grew, but most peasants stayed. Stolypin was shot in 1911.
  6. Your turn. You are a peasant family. Press each button: stay, leave, or move east. Read the gains and risks.

Tip: drag the 3D scene to turn it. Use two fingers to zoom.

🤔 Common doubts, cleared

Did Stolypin only use force?

No. He used force against the unrest, but his main plan was a reform that made peasants owners. See the idea box under the PM.

What is the difference between strips and a compact plot?

In the commune, each family had many thin strips mixed with neighbours'. After leaving, a family got one piece in one place. Compare the left and right.

Where did the settlers go and how many?

To the thinly populated east, about 3 million in 1906–14. Watch the figures walk across.

Why did the III Duma lean towards the landowners?

Because the 1907 law needed only 230 landowners for one elector but 60 000 peasants. Look at the bar heights.

Why was the reform not finished?

The 1911 shooting and the war of 1914 stopped it, and most peasants never left the commune. The 8 houses show only 2 gold ones.

Which choice was safest for a poor family?

Staying in the commune was safest, because the village helped in bad years. Leaving could bring more but also the risk of losing the land. Press the buttons and compare.

Who was Stolypin and why did he act?

Pyotr Stolypin (1862–1911) was a governor, then Minister of the Interior and, from July 1906, Prime Minister (Chairman of the Council of Ministers). The revolution of 1905–06 had shaken the country, and peasants had burnt or seized many landlord estates.

Stolypin used two tools. First, force: field courts-martial punished rebels fast in 1906–07. Second, reform: he wanted to create a class of strong, property-owning peasants who would support order and make farming more productive. This idea is often called the "wager on the strong".

The land reform: ending the commune

In a commune the village shared the land and gave each family many thin strips that were redivided from time to time. Peasants could not leave freely, and nobody had a reason to improve the strips.

The decree of 9 November 1906 (later made a law in 1910) allowed each peasant to leave the commune and ask for his share as private property, as one compact plot: a khutor (farmstead outside the village) or an otrub (a plot while living in the village). The Peasants' Land Bank gave loans to buy land. Redemption payments were cancelled from 1907.

The result: by about 1915 roughly a quarter of peasant households had left the commune. In most villages the commune lived on.

Resettlement to the east

The state also helped peasants from crowded central areas to move to the thinly populated east: Siberia, the Steppe and Central Asia. It offered cheap or free travel (special railway wagons), loans and larger plots. In 1906–1914 about 3 million people moved. Many succeeded and Siberian farming and dairy trade grew. But some settlers found poor land or no help, and about one in five came back.

The 3 June 1907 law and the III and IV Dumas

The Manifesto of 17 October 1905 had created the State Duma. The I Duma (1906) and the II Duma (1907) criticised the government and were dissolved after only a few months. On 3 June 1907 the tsar dissolved the II Duma and changed the voting law without asking the Duma. This is called the Third of June system.

Under the new law the vote was unequal. Voters chose electors, who chose the deputies. One elector stood for about 230 landowners, but for about 60 000 peasants and 125 000 workers. Non-Russian regions got fewer seats.

Results and the end of the reforms

Gains: farming grew, harvests and grain exports rose, and a layer of richer peasant farmers appeared. Siberia filled with new farms.

Limits: most peasants stayed in communes, poor peasants often sold their plots and became landless, and the big estates of nobles were not touched. Many peasants still wanted that land. The reform needed peace and time.

On 1 September 1911 Stolypin was shot in Kyiv and died four days later. The tsar did not keep his course, and in 1914 the First World War began. The reforms stopped. Historians still debate whether they could have prevented revolution.

Key formulas and definitions

Worked examples

1. About 1 in 4 of 9 million communal households left the commune. About how many is that?

9 million ÷ 4 = about 2.25 million households (the real figure was a little above 2 million).

2. Why did the 1906 law help farming?

A peasant with one compact plot of his own could improve the soil, try new crops and borrow money, because he would keep the benefit. In a commune the strips changed hands.

3. Why was the III Duma able to finish its term but the first two could not?

The 1907 voting law gave landowners many more votes. The III Duma was moderate and mostly supported the government, so it was not dissolved.

4. Give two reasons why the reforms did not solve the land problem.

Most peasants stayed in communes, and the big noble estates were not touched, so land hunger remained. Also the reforms were stopped by Stolypin's death and the war.

5. Why is 3 June 1907 called a "coup" by some historians?

The tsar changed the voting law by his own decree. The October Manifesto had said that no law may pass without the Duma, so many saw this as breaking the promise.

Common mistakes

Practice quiz

1. When did Stolypin become Prime Minister?
2. What did the decree of 9 November 1906 allow?
3. Roughly how many people moved east in 1906–14?
4. Which Duma served its full term?
5. What happened to Stolypin in 1911?

Practice: answer these yourself

Type or choose your answer, then press Check. Use a hint if you are stuck; the full solution appears after you answer.

Frequently asked questions

What was the main idea of the Stolypin reforms?

To turn peasants into owners of compact farms, so they would farm better and support order. Help to move east and loans from the Land Bank were part of the plan.

What was the Third of June system?

It is the name for the order set up on 3 June 1907, when the tsar changed the voting law without the Duma. The new law gave landowners many more votes, so the III and IV Dumas were more favourable to the government.

Did the Stolypin reforms succeed?

Partly. Farming and exports grew, and about a quarter of households left the commune. But most peasants stayed, the nobles' estates were not touched, and the work was cut short by his death in 1911 and the war in 1914.

Learn first

Learn next

Related lessons

All History lessons