📘 CodingMarble Learn

Proving √2, √3 and √5 are Irrational

A rational number can be written as p/q (q ≠ 0). An irrational number cannot; its decimal never ends and never repeats. To prove √2 is irrational we assume it is p/q in lowest terms, get p² = 2q², show both p and q are even, and reach a contradiction. The key fact: if a prime divides p², it divides p. Rational + or × irrational (non-zero) is irrational.

🎬 Step-by-step story

  1. This green square has area 2. Its side is √2 = 1.41421356… The digits never stop and never repeat.
  2. Suppose √2 = p/q with no common factor. Squaring gives p² = 2q². Blue blocks show p², orange shows two layers of q². With 7 and 5 we get 49 and 50: close, but not equal.
  3. If p² = 2q², then p² is even. An odd number times itself is odd, so p must be even. Write p = 2c.
  4. Put p = 2c: 4c² = 2q², so q² = 2c². Now q is even too. Both p and q share 2, but we said they had no common factor. Contradiction! So √2 is not p/q.
  5. The same steps work for √3 and √5, because 3 and 5 are primes: if a prime divides p², it divides p.
  6. Free play: change p and q. Try to make p² equal 2q². You never can!

Tip: drag the 3D scene to turn it. Use two fingers to zoom.

🤔 Common doubts, cleared

How can we know digits never repeat if we cannot see them all?

We do not check digits. The proof shows no fraction p/q can equal √2, and every repeating decimal is a fraction.

Why do we assume a and b have no common factor?

Any fraction can be reduced to lowest terms. If even the lowest form fails, every form fails.

Why does "2 divides a²" mean "2 divides a"?

An odd number squared is odd. So if a² is even, a cannot be odd. The purple blocks in step 3 show p² splitting into pairs.

Where exactly is the contradiction?

Both a and b turn out even, so they share 2, but we started with no common factor.

Can 7/5 or 17/12 be √2?

No. 49 ≠ 50 and 289 ≠ 288. Try in free play: p² and 2q² never match.

Rational and irrational numbers

A rational number can be written as p/q, where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0, like 3/4, −5, 0.25. Its decimal either ends or repeats (1/3 = 0.333…).

An irrational number cannot be written as p/q. Its decimal goes on forever without a repeating pattern: √2, √3, √5, π. Rational and irrational numbers together are the real numbers.

The key fact (a theorem we use)

Let p be a prime. If p divides a², then p divides a (a is a positive integer). Why: by the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, the primes of a² are the primes of a, each used twice. So if p appears in a², it was already in a.

Proof that √2 is irrational

This is a proof by contradiction: we assume the opposite and show it leads to something impossible.

  1. Assume √2 is rational: √2 = a/b, where a, b are co-prime integers, b ≠ 0.
  2. Square: 2 = a²/b², so a² = 2b². Hence 2 divides a², so 2 divides a.
  3. Write a = 2c. Then 4c² = 2b², so b² = 2c². Hence 2 divides b², so 2 divides b.
  4. Now 2 divides both a and b. But a, b are co-prime. Contradiction.
  5. So our assumption was wrong: √2 is irrational.

Proof that √3 and √5 are irrational

Same steps, with 3 (or 5) instead of 2. Assume √3 = a/b (co-prime). Then a² = 3b², so 3 divides a. Put a = 3c: 9c² = 3b², so b² = 3c², so 3 divides b. Both share 3: contradiction. For √5, use 5 everywhere.

Note: this works because 2, 3, 5 are prime. For √4 = 2 the proof fails, which is correct since 2 is rational.

Proving numbers like 3 + 2√5 are irrational

Assume 3 + 2√5 = r, a rational number. Then √5 = (r − 3)/2. The right side is rational (rationals are closed under −, ÷). So √5 would be rational, which is false. Hence 3 + 2√5 is irrational.

Rules: rational + irrational = irrational; non-zero rational × irrational = irrational. But irrational + irrational can be rational: √2 + (−√2) = 0.

Try it: a practical

Draw a 1 cm × 1 cm square and measure its diagonal as carefully as you can (about 1.41 cm). Now in the 3D free play, hunt for p and q so that p² = 2q². Write down your closest tries (like 7/5, 17/12). They get close, never exact. That is the proof you can see.

Board exam corner

A 3-mark question almost every year: prove √2, √3 or √5 is irrational, or prove a form like 5 − 2√3 or 1/√2 is irrational. Write every line: the assumption with co-prime a, b, the squaring, the "prime divides a² ⇒ divides a" step, and the clear contradiction statement.

Key formulas and definitions

Worked examples

1. Is 0.101001000100001… rational or irrational?

The pattern of zeros keeps growing, so the decimal never repeats a fixed block. It does not end either. So it is irrational.

2. Prove that √5 is irrational.

Assume √5 = a/b, a and b co-prime. Then a² = 5b², so 5 | a² ⇒ 5 | a. Let a = 5c: 25c² = 5b² ⇒ b² = 5c² ⇒ 5 | b. So 5 divides both a and b, contradicting co-prime. Hence √5 is irrational.

3. Prove that 3 + 2√5 is irrational.

Assume 3 + 2√5 = r (rational). Then √5 = (r − 3)/2, which is rational. But √5 is irrational. Contradiction, so 3 + 2√5 is irrational.

4. Prove that 1/√2 is irrational.

Assume 1/√2 = r (rational, r ≠ 0). Then √2 = 1/r, which is rational. Contradiction. So 1/√2 is irrational.

5. Prove that 7√3 is irrational.

Assume 7√3 = r. Then √3 = r/7 is rational, which is false. So 7√3 is irrational.

6. Prove that √2 + √3 is irrational.

Assume √2 + √3 = r. Then √3 = r − √2. Square: 3 = r² − 2r√2 + 2, so √2 = (r² − 1)/(2r), which is rational. Contradiction. Hence √2 + √3 is irrational.

Common mistakes

Practice quiz

1. Which is irrational?
2. In the √2 proof we reach a² = ?
3. If 3 divides a², then 3 divides:
4. The proof for √2 is a proof by:
5. 2 + √3 is:

Practice: answer these yourself

Type or choose your answer, then press Check. Use a hint if you are stuck; the full solution appears after you answer.

Frequently asked questions

How do you prove √2 is irrational?

Assume √2 = a/b in lowest terms, square to get a² = 2b², show both a and b are even, which contradicts lowest terms.

Why is π irrational but 22/7 rational?

22/7 is only an approximation of π. π itself cannot be written as a fraction; 22/7 = 3.142857… repeats.

Is the sum of two irrationals always irrational?

No. √2 + (−√2) = 0 is rational.

Where this is taught

CBSE (India)Class 10Number Systems
CBSE (India)Class 10Number Systems

Learn first

Learn next

Related lessons

All Maths lessons